unique visitors counter James Woods Shuts Down Monica Lewinsky’s Profanity Laced SCOTUS Temper Tantrum With One Line – Washington News

James Woods Shuts Down Monica Lewinsky’s Profanity Laced SCOTUS Temper Tantrum With One Line

Sharing is caring!

The left had a total meltdown over the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade and let each state make its own laws that best reflect the views of the residents.

Despite Obama not using his huge Congressional majority to make codify abortion rights and despite the fact that Joe Biden supported giving the decision back to the states in 1982, the left is still furious at the conservative judges.

Barbra Streisand said: “The Court uses religious dogma to overturn the constitutional right to abortion. This Court is the American Taliban.”

Mark Ruffalo said: “Time to fight like hell in any way you know how. The American Taliban has taken over the Supreme Court.”

But it was Monica Lewinsky who had the biggest meltdown until conservative Hollywood star James Woods silenced Bill Clinton’s former lover.

Monica said on Twitter:

F*ck you roberts.

F*ck you thomas.

F*ck you alito.

F*ck you kavanaugh.

F*ck you gorsuch.

F*ck you coney barrett.

Enyter James Woods:

“You’re going to need a bigger dress.”

Biden, despite supporting a constitutional amendment that would have overturned Roe v. Wade and allowed states to choose their own policies on abortion in 1982, something he called at the time “the single most difficult vote I’ve cast as a U.S. senator,” said:

“Today, the Supreme Court of the United States expressly took away a constitutional right from the American people that it had already recognized. They didn’t limit it. They simply took away.

“This is not over.

“It was three justices named by one president, Donald Trump, who were the core of today’s decision to upend the scales of justice and eliminate a fundamental right for women in this country. 

“Make no mistake — this decision is a culmination of a deliberate effort over decades to upset the balance of our law. It’s a realization of an extreme ideology and a tragic error by the Supreme Court, in my view.

“It concerns me a great deal that, after 50 years, we’re going to decide that a woman doesn’t have the right to choose.

“But even more equally profound is the rationale used — and it would mean that every other decision relating to the notion of privacy is thrown into question.

“This fall, Roe is on the ballot.

“Personal freedoms are on the ballot. The right to privacy, liberty, equality, they’re all on the ballot. 

“Until then, I will do all in my power to protect a woman’s right in states where they will face the consequences of today’s decision.” 

“My administration will remain vigilant as the implications of this decision play out.

 “I’ve warned about how this decision risks the broader right to privacy for everyone. That’s because Roe recognized the fundamental right to privacy that has served as the basis for so many more rights that — we’ve come to take for granted that are engrained in the fabric of this country — the right to make the best decisions for your health, the right to use birth control, the right to privacy of a couple in their bedroom, for God’s sake, the right to marry the person you love. 

“Justice Thomas said as much today, he explicitly called to reconsider the right of marriage equality, the right of couples to make their choices on contraception. 

“This is an extreme and dangerous path that the court is now taking us on.”